Chapter 2 Humanitarian Projects and Monitoring and Evaluation

Before moving forward, a basic set of project-monitoring definitions could be useful. There are several types of monitoring in any programme such as; process monitoring, results monitoring, context monitoring, risk monitoring, impact monitoring etc. Monitoring4CTP, a monitoring guidance for CTP made by USAid and CALP, is a fruitful and well-tailored document. I strongly advise this document to anyone who works in humanitarian sector.

Project Monitoring by CALP

As per monitoring type, there are several method intersections. Yet, the data skills comes into play when we ask evaluation questions. An amazing visual prepared by IFRC, we can clearly see those steps and questions.

Project Monitoring by CALP

Yes, all good, but why M&E is important ?

  • Support project/programme implementation with accurate, evidence-based reporting that informs management and decision-making to guide and improve project/programme performance.

  • Contribute to organizational learning and knowledge sharing by reflecting upon and sharing experiences and lessons so that we can gain the full benefit from what we do and how we do it.

  • Uphold accountability and compliance by demonstrating whether or not our work has been carried out as agreed and in compliance with established standards.

  • Provide opportunities for stakeholder feedback, especially beneficiaries, to provide input into and perceptions of our work, modelling openness to criticism, and willingness to learn from experiences and to adapt to changing needs.

  • Promote and celebrate our work by highlighting our accomplishments and achievements, building morale and contributing to resource mobilization

These points are quoted from M&E guide of IFRC. All smooth right? Did you ever see a humanitarian programme, especially a cash-based intervention with zero monitoring? I did and it was horrible. No accountability, no promotion and celebration of work, no highlights, no lessons learned, no voice of beneficiaries. Just distribute some cash to undefined and unjustified target group and come back home. Still think a programme without M&E or AAP/CEA is a good idea? Still think that this is a quality layer and not a must? You will not survive in humanitarian sector. Imagine you are a donor, would give your assets to someone with good M&E system and monitoring plan or would you pick other way around.